37
edits
Talk:Scramblecoin: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
m (→Strategy) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Strategy == | == Strategy == | ||
Should we rank opponents? Merlin, Rapunzel, and EVE are great pieces for the CPU. Flynn is a terrible piece. Forky seems bad for the CPU too. CPU also generally uses charge pieces (or any piece with multiple moves like Remy/Lumiere?Cogsworth/Anna) decently. Sometimes additional movement pieces (Rafiki/WALL-E/Fairy Godmother) can give CPU some surprise wins when paired with Merlin/Rapunzel. I propose a 5 star ranking: | Should we rank opponents? Merlin, Rapunzel, and EVE are great pieces for the CPU. Flynn is a terrible piece. Forky seems bad for the CPU too. CPU also generally uses charge pieces (or any piece with multiple moves like Remy/Lumiere?Cogsworth/Anna) decently. Sometimes additional movement pieces (Rafiki/WALL-E/Fairy Godmother) can give CPU some surprise wins when paired with Merlin/Rapunzel. I propose a 5 star ranking: | ||
* 1 star: Goofy, probably Gaston | * 1 star: Goofy, probably Gaston too | ||
* 2 star: Mickey (who just has starter pieces) | * 2 star: Mickey (who just has starter pieces) | ||
* 3 star: Donald (has EVE). | * 3 star: Donald (has EVE). | ||