Information for "Talk:Scramblecoin"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
View the protection log for this page.
Information from Extension:WikiSEO
Basic information
| Display title | Talk:Scramblecoin |
| Default sort key | Scramblecoin |
| Page length (in bytes) | 1,756 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 13421 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | Vknightbd (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 23:45, 15 December 2023 |
| Latest editor | Lizz (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 17:18, 18 December 2023 |
| Total number of edits | 9 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 2 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Should we rank opponents? Merlin, Rapunzel, and EVE are great pieces for the CPU. Flynn is a terrible piece. Forky seems bad for the CPU too. CPU also generally uses charge pieces (or any piece with multiple moves like Remy/Lumiere?Cogsworth/Anna) decently. Sometimes additional movement pieces (Rafiki/WALL-E/Fairy Godmother) can give CPU some surprise wins when paired with Merlin/Rapunzel. I propose a 5 star ranking for difficulty of opponenets: |